May 102013
 

We have made it to the end of another academic year, and I will take a few minutes to pause and reflect before diving into the projects that have been unattended to as the result of a very busy spring. We have commencement ceremonies tonight and tomorrow, and I am very happy for the students that I have worked with who will be graduating this weekend.

I have finished my final class towards my doctorate degree, and am now in the process of writing my dissertation proposal, with the hopes of conducting my research in the fall before writing and defending the final product. My study is focusing on the self-efficacy of practitioners to manage conflict in the student conduct setting, with student conduct including adjudicatory processes, mediation, restorative justice practices, conflict coaching, and other forums of resolution. I have identified a host institution and am really looking forward to getting underway, with the hopes of being able to participate in my own commencement ceremony next May. :-)

This summer is focused on getting the doctoral proposal submitted, as well as moving forward on some NCHERM projects. One thing I am very excited about is the upcoming new mediation curriculum, which I am hoping will be done by the end of the summer. We have been using some of the new material in training programs, and the revised curriculum is definitely an upgrade over the older Mastering Mediation materials. More information will follow about the completion of these materials, as well as when and where they will be available for campuses to purchase.

Next, some exciting news at Illinois State; this morning Dr. Timothy Flanagan was named as the 18th President of Illinois State University, replacing Dr. Al Bowman, who is retiring as of next week. Dr. Flanagan is currently the President of Framingham State College in Framingham, Massachusetts, where he also serves as a professor of sociology. Previously, he served as the provost and vice president for academic affairs and a professor of criminal justice at College at Brockport, State University of New York. Dr. Flanagan holds a Ph.D. in criminal justice from the University of Albany, State University of New York. Dr. Flanagan also received his M.A. at Albany, as well as a B.A. from Gannon University in Erie, Pennsylvania. He is a native of Pittsburgh, PA. Everyone here at ISU knows that Dr. Bowman has helped transform our institution during his tenure, and the common theme here is that he is leaving very big shoes to fill. This is a very different institution than the one I arrived at more then seventeen years ago; we are far better academically and we are in sound financial shape thanks to Dr. Bowman and his team. A sense of Redbird Pride exists here now that was unheard of just ten years ago, and Dr. Bowman deserves much of the credit. I am looking forward to seeing where our institution goes from here, and wish Dr. Flanagan all of the best as he takes over an institution that I love dearly.

On a more personal note, my wife and I will be finally getting away for our honeymoon this summer as we head off to spend some time on a distant beach. Then when we get back she will be starting her new job working here at Illinois State, which I am also very excited about.

I have been making some updates to this site and am trying to freshen it up a bit… more content and links will be added over the new few weeks. I’ll also be posting more updates this summer as developments warrant… in the meantime I wish everyone a happy summer!

 Comments Off
May 242012
 

I haven’t done much updating of late, as I have been busy with many different projects. More information will follow during the summer, but here’s a re-cap of what I’ve been up to.

Rick at Chamber of Commerce

Rick keynotes Chamber of Commerce educational conference

On May 17, I had the opportunity to keynote a McLean County Chamber of Conference EDUCate conference with the theme of “Who changed the game? The new rules of work.” I presented an hour long speech on conflict management in both the work place and at home to over 90 participants in attendance. I then facilitated an hour long follow-up breakout session on conflict management styles. Thanks to all thos who were in attendance for your participation and excellent questions. Many thanks to Brian Davis at the Chamber for his gracious invitation.

Rick with incoming Student Body Vice President Neo Chung

ISU update

After a five year run, my tenure as advisor to the Student Government Association at Illinois State University has come to an end. As many of you know, I am in a unique situation at Illinois State where we are very progressive about annually reviewing our responsibilities as deans to match both organizational goals and our individual professional interests. Given that I had five years in the role and am embarking on some major life transitions, it seemed like a good time to step aside and give someone the opportunity to engage in what is a very fulfilling job role. Associate Dean John Davenport has stepped into the role, and I think he will do a fantastic job. I had the opportunity to work with many incredibly bright and talented students during my tenure with SGA, and will miss this role a great deal. My thanks go out to Dave Horstein, Ted Mason, Matt Spialek, David Marquis, Zach Owens, and many, many talented students that made my job as advisor an absolute pleasure. Special thanks to Aaron Von Qualen for presenting me afterwards with a very thoughtful momento from our past year together.

NCHERM-CR updates

As you can see in another post, next month NCHERM-CR will be hosting a summit on the use of conflict resolution and restorative justice practices in Title IX cases. We have an amazing collection of talent traveling to Skidmore College in Saratoga Springs, NY for two days as we work to create a model for addressing these cases in a way that provides socially just outcomes that attend to the needs of all parties. I am looking forward to working closely with our partner campuses as we move forward with applying practical solutions that also meet our needs for compliance with federal and state laws.

The new mediation training curriculum is being conceptualized and written this summer, with Matt Gregory and I hoping to pilot the new materials in the fall semester with publication soon to follow. More information will be posted as we move forward.

We are currently working with host campuses to provide mediation and conflict resolution training programs to individual campuses. We are also seeking hosts for regional training programs in areas around the United States. If you are interested in serving as a host site, please contact me through this website.

Academic update

I passed my comprehensive exams, now making me a candidate moving forward with my dissertation. I am working on formalizing my proposal this summer and defending the proposal early in the fall. For all those who have been a source of support and inspiration along the way, I offer my thanks and my assurance that a successful end to this journey is in site!

Personal update

Foe those who are not aware, I am getting married this summer and buying a house prior to that, so this will be a summer of wonderful transitions. Feel free to keep checking in and I’ll do my best to keep everyone posted om what promises to be a very busy summer and fall.

 

 

 

 Comments Off
May 242012
 

From the NCHERM-CR website:

Summit on the Application of Restorative Justice Practice to Cases of Campus Sexual Misconduct

SKIDMORE COLLEGE, SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY, JUNE 28TH-29TH

The NCHERM-CR, the Conflict Resolution Practice Group of the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management (www.ncherm.org), will be hosting a two-day invitational Summit on the use of restorative justice practices in student-on-student sexual misconduct cases.

This Summit is being convened to explore ways in which forms of conflict resolution, and especially restorative justice practices, may be utilized lawfully, productively and beneficially to improve on the traditional approaches used in student disciplinary proceedings.

The goals of the Summit are two-fold; to develop a set of model best practices for use on college and university campuses and to empower the creation of a pilot project to implement and research the effectiveness of the model.

Three colleges have agreed to send delegates to the Summit and to serve for a year as pilot sites for the model. Vassar College, Franklin & Marshall College and Colgate University will be working with the consultants from NCHERM-CR to demonstrate effectiveness so that the model can eventually be implemented for all interested colleges and universities.

The challenge is to provide for accountability and protection so that the severity of sexual misconduct is not minimized, but also create environments where victims choose to come forward and are empowered by a process that offers more effective educational, healing and cathartic effects for the participants and the community.

This Summit is a first of its kind event, which will take place at Skidmore College in Saratoga Springs, NY on June 28th-29th, bringing together experts in higher education conflict resolution, restorative justice, victim advocacy, law, policy, prevention and research. The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) will also be sending delegates to address the Title IX implications of the NCHERM-CR project. NCHERM-CR has invited the country’s leading experts on this subject, including:

Rick Olshak, Illinois State University (Summit Co-Chair);

Matt Gregory, Louisiana State University;

Chris Loschiavo, University of Florida;

Brett A. Sokolow, The National Center for Higher Education Risk Management;

Jan Masland, Franklin and Marshall College;

Kim Taylor, Colgate University;

Susan Smith, Colgate University;

Mark Thompson, Colgate University;

Batia Epelbaum Karabell, Vassar College;

Elizabeth Schrock, Vassar College;

Kaaren Williamson, Carleton College;

Joanne Mullen, Carleton College;

Mary Koss, University of Arizona;

Nina Cummings, Cornell University;

Mary Beth Grant, Cornell University;

Michelle Issadore, School and College Organization for Prevention Educators;

Anna Moretto-Cramer, New York Office for Civil Rights;

Janet Pfeffer, New York Office for Civil Rights;

Duke Fisher, Learning Laboratories, Inc. (Summit facilitator);

Rochelle Calhoun, Skidmore College;

Mariel Martin, Skidmore College;

David Karp, Skidmore College (Summit Co-Chair).

NCHERM-CR Practice Group Chair Rick Olshak sees the Summit as an important first step in assisting campuses to properly manage sexual misconduct complaints. “While we know that OCR has ruled out mediation for the purpose of resolving these complaints, there are often other factors and interests at stake that are never properly addressed through our traditional adjudication systems,” Olshak said. “Additionally, restorative justice offers us the potential of being able to properly discipline students in these cases while also providing forums for all parties to be equitably engaged and empowered in the process.”

NCHERM Managing Partner Brett A. Sokolow, Esq., added that “In my mind, there has always been a critical element missing from campus efforts to address sexual misconduct — the element of healing and restoration. Some campuses have experimented with applying restorative justice to sexual misconduct, but efforts to date have not yielded a broadly-applicable model. We firmly believe that it can be done and done well when the right ingredients are in place in the right way. The Summit is the opportunity to bring the best minds into thoughtful collaboration around a set of transformative principles and practices. The campuses selected to pilot are ideal because their communities are committed, they have implemented state-of-the-field policies and procedures to assure Title IX compliance already, and have done so with an eye toward being able to bring restorative practices into play. We are all excited to see what can be accomplished in June.”

For additional information on the Summit, please contact Rick Olshak at rick@ncherm.org or David Karp at david@ncherm.org. 610.993.0229.

 Comments Off
Feb 142012
 

The week of February 1-7 proved to be quite an interesting one in my life, both personally and professionally. I started the week traveling to the annual conference of the Association for Student Conduct Administration (ASCA), my first trip back to ASCA since they moved their conference location from Clearwater Beach, FL to St, Pete Beach, FL. The new location at the Tradewinds is a great choice, and the staff there demonstrated exceptional customer service and attention to detail throughout my visit. I began the conference by proposing to my partner Sandra (she accepted), so the week could have ended right there and I would have been happy.

But the week did not end there; it was only beginning. The conference focused heavily on issues surrounding Title IX, threat assessment, and conflict resolution. Perhaps the best session came right away in the conference when Brett Sokolow, Bernice Sandler, Wendy Murphy, and Nancy Hogshead-Makar presented a powerful session on Title IX and the Dear Colleague Letter. Sandler in particular was a treat to hear, given her history and deep involvement in Title IX. The follow up question and answer session was equally entertaining and enlightening.

The conference also saw the public introduction of NCHERM-CR, a professional practice group out of the National Center for Higher Education Risk Management (NCHERM). As the “CR” designation suggests, this group focuses on conflict resolution strategies beyond the adjudication of student conduct, focusing on mediation, conflict coaching, and restorative justice. I am honored that Brett Sokolow has asked me to chair this group, which at present includes such talented professionals as Chris Loschiavo (University of Florida), David Karp (Skidmore College), and Matt Gregory (LSU). We are currently developing our program menu and considering our initial projects as we launch what we hope will be a transformational effort in the area of student conduct and conflict resolution. I feel a debt of gratitude to Brett Sokolow, who sees this opportunity to benefit our profession and to give life to a network of professionals, several of us of whom were struggling to advance the former Campus Mediation Project. We will be adding more professionals over time, as well as working with consultants on a project by project basis. I am very excited about the work that we have to do. I am also now beginning the re-write of my original mediation training materials, which I expect to complete by summer in advance of the 2012-2013 training calendar.

While at the ASCA conference, I was also notified that I had passed my doctoral comps, a huge step towards finishing the degree that I have long labored over. I am currently developing my dissertation proposal, which I hope to defend at the end of the spring.

As a result of the need to focus on my dissertation and my getting married this coming summer, I am giving up my work responsibility of advising our Student Government Association (SGA). This is a particularly difficult decision for me, given my love of our student government, and my own roots as a student leader in college. But I have had the privilege of doing this for five years, feel very good abut where our SGA is in its development, and believe very strongly that it is time for someone new to have this opportunity. My colleague (Associate Dean) John Davenport will be taking over advisement reins at the Passing of the Gavel ceremony in April.

The first week of February unfortunately did not end with the one piece of news that I hoped for, as I watched the New York (New Jersey, let’s be honest!) Giants once again beat my beloved New England Patriots in Super Bowl XVLI. But given the rest of the week, I have to say it wasn’t all that disheartening, as the Patriots are well positioned to be competitive for the foreseeable future. All in all, I couldn’t ask for a much better week!

 

 Comments Off
Jan 182012
 

I know I’ve been on a bit of a hiatus from posting here, but it’s been very needed. The end of 2011 and the beginning of 2012 have been very eventful, both in my personal and professional life. There is lots to share as I move forward this year, so keep checking back for regular updates.

The big personal news to date is that I have completed my comprehensive examinations (pending approval) and am now moving forward full-speed with my dissertation proposal, which I plan to defend in late spring. I have refined my research questions in the process of preparing for comps, and am now looking at a qualitative review of the preparedness of student affairs practitioners (most notably in student conduct and/or conflict resolution) to manage conflicts and to assist others in managing conflicts. It is based off a small pilot study I did back in 2004, and I am pretty excited about having a sense of clarity on my topic.

Work continues to go along well, and our Student Government Association continues to have a very productive and successful year. They have had many achievements this year, and have launched a new website to better connect with students. I am looking forward to seeing what this group can accomplish before they are done in April and a new group takes over.

In terms of conflict resolution work, I have decided that the Campus Mediation Project has finally run its course. While there is much work to be done in terms of promoting the development and implementation of more comprehensive conflict resolution systems on college campuses, the CMP is simply no longer the vehicle to be able to accomplish this. The movement is much bigger than mediation now, and needs to provide for a full spectrum of conflict resolution services. Additionally, the structure of CMP simply was not allowing me the opportunity to do as much as I would like.

However, there is an announcement coming in the next couple of weeks about my next project, which I am very excited about. More news will be posted on this site in early February involving campus conflict resolution efforts, so please stay tuned!

 

 

 Comments Off
Nov 092011
 

Here is a very kind article written by Eric Jome that was written for “Identity,” which is Illinois State University’s online newsletter for diversity issues. The original article can be found here.

Dean of Students staff members receive cultural competence training

You can claim you have no pre-conceived notions about others, but that is simply not true. Somewhere, on some level, everyone has biases and prejudices. You may not always be conscious of them, but they certainly influence how you interact and communicate with others. It can be a sobering experience to realize this about yourself. It can also be a daunting, but ultimately liberating, experience to face those biases and move beyond them.

Facing up to personal bias and prejudice has been a cornerstone of cultural competence training programs for staff members in the Dean of Students Office. The ongoing training, organized by the unit’s 10-member Cultural Competence Committee, has helped A/P and Civil Service staff members and graduate assistants to confront and identify biases and find ways to move beyond them in order to better communicate with students and other campus constituencies. Associate Dean of Students Rick Olshak chairs the Cultural Competence Committee and feels that the overall mission of the Dean of Students Office has been greatly enhanced, and that staff members have benefitted from the training, both personally and professionally.

“A lot of us will say ‘I’m not prejudiced, I treat everyone equally,’” said Olshak. “The truth is we do have biases, and they cause us to treat some people differently. The ultimate purpose of the training is to move us beyond simply acknowledging and appreciating diversity and help us achieve a true level of understanding about others that allows us to be more open in our communications. The training sessions have been very empowering for staff members.”

Empowering and daunting. Olshak and other committee members began the training sessions in May 2010 by bringing in professional trainers to cover social justice issues. A staff retreat then took on the difficult topic of dealing with personal prejudices. That exercise was an eye-opening experience even for staff members who are used to dealing with issues of diversity in their daily work. “The issues became very real for people during those sessions, sometimes hitting a nerve,” said Olshak. “Staff members had to really examine questions like ‘what sets me off?’ and ‘how do I handle it?.’”

That self-examination process was not limited to staff members. All operations of the Dean of Students Office were examined using the cultural competency lens. Interactions with students and other campus constituencies were evaluated; the text, photos and overall message of the office’s printed communications and web content were examined; and the physical layout of offices was scrutinized. “We examined our whole environment with one question in mind, ‘Do people feel comfortable?’” said Olshak. He notes that the initial study and ongoing evaluation of communications and operations on all levels have greatly enhanced the already open and inclusive atmosphere in the Dean of Students Office.

Staff members continue their cultural competency training throughout the year with sessions that look at issues on both a personal and intellectual level. In addition to examining individual attitudes and ideas, sessions have focused on broader issues such as stereotypes and situations of dominance or submissiveness within a cultural setting.

Olshak credits Associate Dean of Students Rick Lewis for being an office role model and personal mentor throughout the cultural competency training process. “Rick has had a big influence throughout this whole process and has given me a lot of help coordinating these programs,” Olshak said. “His mentoring has helped me to think about my background a lot more, and how it influences my words and actions. With my professional background in mediation, I look for commonalities and ways to bridge differences. You can’t base your interactions with others on stereotypes. That’s just lacking in wits, and it’s dangerous.”

During the training sessions and discussions about cultural issues, Olshak has had time to reflect again on the deep prejudices held by members of his own family during his youth, and how growth experiences such as military service and college helped him to move beyond them. That personal experience helps him to put the whole process of cultural competency training into context.

“When you have a greater awareness of attitudes and prejudices. you start to examine your own thoughts, actions and words more carefully,” Olshak said. “That’s a learning process that never ends. Listening is the real key to that learning. You need to listen instead of thinking about what you’re going to say next.”

 Comments Off
May 172011
 

From Rick:

First, I want to thank all of the people who either left comments on my last entry or who took the time to write me kind words. “OCR versus the One-Trick Pony” and my other DCL entries generated a lot more traffic and feedback than I expected, further reinforcing my belief that educators see this as a very important discussion.

Beyond the DCL letter being an important point of discussion, it is also becoming clear that FIRE is being exposed as an organization with a political agenda and as an organization that is either unable or unwilling to take a reasoned position in order to promote collegial discourse. There is nothing collegial about FIRE, and their alarmist hyperbole about grand conspiracies that lack evidence reveals their true nature. Last week’s continued assault on the preponderance test is an excellent example of projecting hysteria over facts, and served as fodder for a close friend and colleague, Dan Kast, to write a response which will appear in detail in an article in the Summer 2011 issue of the Journal of Campus Safety & Student Development. I have had an opportunity to preview it and promise that people will not be disappointed with Dan’s reasoned but pointed response.

Like myself, Dan also had some strong reactions to FIRE’s hyperbole and took specific aim at a separate article written by Samantha Harris, FIRE’s Director of Speech Code Research. I won’t talk much about Dan’s response, since he has been kind enough to forward it to me to share via this blog. Suffice it to say that I enjoyed this piece immensely, and once again find Dan’s logic to be solid and his argument pointed. Enjoy the read!

Poking holes in FIRE’s false arguments (by Dan Kast)

If FIRE plans to make a case for having a seat at the table as discussions move forward about the appropriate resolution of sexual violence claims, it would be well-served to educate itself about the real problems faced by all of our students, instead of ignoring the plight of victims while alleging non-existent conspiracies to deprive the accused of fundamental fairness.

On May 5, 2011, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) released its response to the Office for Civil Rights’ (OCR) “Dear Colleague Letter” of April 4. In this letter, FIRE argued that a preponderance of the evidence standard – used for decades by the majority of colleges and universities in all types of misconduct, and required by the Department of Education for the resolution of Title IX grievances – does not adequately protect the due process rights of accused students.

I had hoped FIRE’s oblivious lack of concern for, and disregard for the rights of, the victims of sexual assault was merely a consequence of its misguided belief in a widespread, systemic effort within higher education to force “political correctness” upon students and stifle freedom of expression. Viewed through this lens, an exclusive focus on the rights of the accused is understandable, though hardly justifiable. After all, FIRE’s mission is to “defend and sustain individual rights”; I can only assume this is meant to include everyone’s rights, not just those accused of serious misconduct. Continue reading »